Day 2

Day 2

Today seems like it will be another great day for restoring. As of 9:15 a.m. EST I have taped and strapped. I figure, since most people have never heard, let alone seen, what the process of restoring looks like, that I'd add a few pictures so everyone will be able to visualize the process a little better. But those will be at the end of the post.

I am very much in high spirits about this as I can't hardly wait to know what it's like to be as Nature intended. I can't wait to masturebate for the first time without the need of lubrication, I can't wait to have sex for the first time and feel the gliding action I've heard and read so much about but no nothing of, or even to just pee for the first time as an intact male. All these thoughts excite me because I've read that 98% of restoring males regain sensitivity to the glands (head) during and after restoring due to the new coverage. This is said to great change and improve sexual response and make the act more pleasurable. It has also been posted by many wives and significant others of restorers that their over all sex life has become better and more alive due to the new skin.

I guess for me I just feel like I was never given a chance to experiance my own penis the way it was at birth. That was taken from me without my permission because some Medical Prick thought it medically necessary because of his beliefs. I resent my mother mildly for the choice she made but we have discussed and gotten past this issue. When I found out the a man could literally grow this skin back -less a few thousand nerves, veins, and other important parts only found in natural foreskin- I felt a weight lift from my shoulders. I felt I could finally know what being a natural man was like.

So for all you mothers or even fathers out there who are considering circumcision for your sons keep this in mind: circumcising an infant removes 50% of the overall skin of the penis, stunts growth and maturity of the penis, canterizes (desensitizes) the glands (head) causing, eventually, erectile dysfunction in later life, is actually worse for the baby as far as chance of infections, and above all is completely unnatural. Just think of it like this: if you had a daughter and had to have her circumcised like a baby boy, you'd be removing the clitoral hood and the entire inner labia (labia minora, or inner lips) as well as breaking and removing the hymen. The fact of the matter is, no matter id its a boy or girl, no matter how one may try to justify it, IT IS STILL GENITAL MUTILATON! If that sheds some light of reality I hope you think real hard about your decision to remove the one thing that actually protects your childs penis. If it were a big problem and a henderance WE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN BORN WITH IT!

It's time America catch up with the rest of the world. In all honesty circumcision should be outlawed for boys under the age of consent. Once they are old enough to make that decision, more power to them. Or if it be medically necessary ( like really medically necessary, not based on a particular doctors opinion) then by all means do what must be done. Call your represenitives and make it known. Tell them this is just as much mutilation as that which is done to young girls in other countries around the world only it's legal and smiled upon here. If we can let them know we want change we can achieve a better generation to come and finally live as a people the way God had made us.

Now that I got all that out, here are the pics. I've included 2 of what the T-Tape looks like on, and 2 of how it looks once strapped.











-- Posted via iPhone